Legal Opinion

EZ Pawn Corp. v. Mancias

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1996No. 96-0391PublishedCited by 375 opinions

1Per curiam

In this proceeding, Texas EZPawn, L.P. d/b/a EZPawn 1 and Dennis Terry (collectively EZPawn) seek relief from the trial court’s order denying arbitration of their dispute with Roel Gonzalez. EZPawn has sought relief by petition for writ of mandamus and by application for writ of error. EZPawn presents the case in this dual posture because the arbitration agreement in question incorporates both the Federal Arbitration Act (the FAA) 2 , and the Texas Arbitration Act. The Texas Act provides for interlocutory appeal of an order denying an application to compel arbitration. See Tex. Civ. PRAC. &…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Thigpen v. LockeTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Prudential Securities Inc. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Padilla v. LaFranceTexas Supreme Court · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by375 opinions

  1. In Re Firstmerit Bank, N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Perry Homes v. CullTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In Re Weekley Homes, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In Re Poly-America, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  5. In Re Oakwood Mobile Homes, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999

370 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API