Legal Opinion

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Marhofer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherick, J.

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, defendant below, seeks a reversal in this court of the judgment entered against it in the court of common pleas of Coshocton county. The cause of action grows out of an injury sustained by Yiola Marhofer, plaintiff below, in a collision on State Route 16, at a point where it is intersected by a road of lesser importance. The plaintiff was proceeding south on the intersecting road, stopped, and then made a left-hand turn into and proceeded east over and upon the south or what would be to her the right-hand side of the main highway. At this point the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tresise v. AshdownOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. State v. KellyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Paterson & Edey Lumber Co. v. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  4. Dowell v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  5. Siegal v. Portage Yellow Cab Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Villella v. Waikem Motors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Halkias v. Wilkoff Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Pisanick-Miller v. Roulette Pontiac-Cadillac GMC, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. MarhoferOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Tailford v. HeroldOhio Court of Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API