Legal Opinion
Halkias v. Wilkoff Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 24, 1943No. 29096PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
Substantially, the sole controversy in this-case relates to the question whether the person who-operated the crane causing plaintiff’s injury was at the time acting as .an employee of the defendant and had authority to perform such operation.
The testimony offered by the plaintiff in chief showed that some person without notice to the plaintiff, undertook to operate and did operate the crane from its position at the end to a point near the center of the building where the wheels or truck of the crane came in contact with the plaintiff while he was at work near the crane track on one of the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Powell v. Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- Higgins v. . Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Judson v. Bee Hive Auto Service Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Ramsey v. New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Miller v. Minnesota & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Helmick v. Republic-Franklin InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Ragone v. Vitali & Beltrami, Jr., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Williams v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- Wilkeson v. Erskine & Son, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.