Tailford v. Herold

There was a conflict of evidence not only as to whether Dr. Herold was guilty of negligence in permitting the ring to remain on, but also as to whether or not the plaintiff herself was guilty of contributory negligence with respect thereto.

It is contended in this court that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence. We are satisfied that the verdict is not so manifestly against the weight of the evidence that this court should disturb it.

It is also contended that the trial court' committed error in charging the jury as follows:

“If the evidence of the plaintiff raises a presumption…