Legal Opinion

Pisanick-Miller v. Roulette Pontiac-Cadillac GMC, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1991No. 89-L-14-034PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peter C. Economus, Judge.

In March 1988, appellee, Mary Pisanick-Miller, initiated an action in the Lake County Court of Common Pleas against appellant, Roulette Pontiac-Cadillac GMC, Inc. The complaint alleged that appellee had experienced numerous difficulties with an automobile she had leased from appellant in December 1984. As grounds for recovery, appellee alleged a breach of an express warranty, a breach of an implied warranty of merchantability, fraudulent misrepresentation, and unfair business practices.

In its answer, appellant denied the majority of the allegations in the complaint…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stores Realty Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. MarhoferOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. In Re Adoption of EarhartOhio Court of Appeals · 1961

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ceol v. Zion Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Turowski v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Murrell v. Williamsburg Local School DistrictOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Masturzo v. Revere Road SynagogueOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Chiropractic Clinic of Solon v. KutskoOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API