Luxor Cab Co. v. Cahill
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR, P. J.
This is an appeal by Luxor Cab Company and Chauffeurs Union Local 265, 1 hereafter appellants, from a judgment denying petitions for injunction and writ of mandate to prevent respondents, 2 Board of Permit Appeals and Police Commissioners (hereafter collectively referred to as Board) of the City and County of San Francisco, from issuing 110 new certificates for the operation of taxicabs in 1968. Appellants contend that their petitions should have been granted as: 1) the Board failed to malee specific findings; 2) the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment; and 3)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- In Re PetersenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Greif v. DulleaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Gong v. City of FremontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Alejo v. TorlaksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Cotta v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- McDonald's Systems of California, Inc. v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Subriar v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- O'CONNOR v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.