Legal Opinion

Subriar v. City of Bakersfield

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1976No. Civ. 2433PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CARKEET, J. *

This case arose out of the respondent Subriar’s operating an ambulance business in the City of Bakersfield without first having obtained a certificate of convenience and necessity as required by chapter 7.62 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code. Respondent Subriar on two different occasions filed applications for obtaining a certificate. At the time of respondent’s first application there was only one ambúlance operator in the city. But upon the filing of each application, the respondent, Subriar, refused to provide any information to show that public convenience and…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Van Atta v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Saathoff v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Vedanta Society of Southern California v. California Quartet Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Mammoth Lakes Land Acquisition, LLC v. Town of Mammoth LakesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Morristown Emergency & Rescue Squad, Inc. v. Volunteer Development Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API