Legal Opinion
O'CONNOR v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 6, 1979No. Docket Nos. 44865, 44907PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHRISTIAN, J.
James E. O'Connor et al., and Luxor Cab Company et al., seek writs of mandate to compel respondent superior court to issue preliminary injunctions to prevent real parties in interest, the City and County of San Francisco, the San Francisco Police Commission, Charles R. Gain, and the Controller of the City and County of San Francisco, from enforcing a measure adopted by popular vote. Relief is sought on two theories: that the measure was not properly submitted to the voters and that it is unconstitutional.
An order denying a preliminary injunction is subject to review on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People Ex Rel. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commission v. Town of EmeryvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- In Re PetersenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Rosenblatt v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. AmdurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cotta v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Owens v. City of Signal HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Yesson v. San Francisco Municipal Transportation AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Nev. Yellow Cab Corp. v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2022
- Newsham v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.