Legal Opinion

Van Slyck v. Skinner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1879PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Branch. Foreclosure. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

This bill was filed to foreclose a mortgage made by defendants Milo A. Skinner and Eliza L., his wife, to complainant, December 21, 1874, on. the undi*188vided half of the northwest quarter of section twenty in township seven south of range five west in Branch county.

Robert Smith was originally a defendant, but having died the case was revived and his heirs brought in by stipulation. • The bill was taken as confessed, except as against Smith and Giddings. On their part defense has been made, and this appeal from the decree below, in favor of complainant, is made in furtherance of that defense.

For…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. White v. CarpenterNew York Court of Chancery · 1830
  3. Dawson v. Danbury BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Adams v. BradleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Hull v. SwarthoutMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stevens v. RoseMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Weisberger v. WisnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. OrensteinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. McMillan v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. OrensteinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API