Legal Opinion

Derham v. Hovey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1917No. Docket No. 40PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Shiawassee; Williams, J., presiding. Bill by Chloe M. Derham against Henrietta E. Hovey and another to restrain waste and for an ac■counting. From a decree for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

The bill is filed to restrain waste .and for an accounting. It was dismissed at the hearing in the court below, and plaintiff, appealing, presents two questions for decision. The first is whether¿9 the defendant Henrietta E. Hovey is a Tenant of the premises, without impeachment of waste; the other whether, if she is dispunishable of waste, wESTshe did, or was doing, was nevertheless waste.

Henry O. Hovey and Henrietta E. Hovey, his wife, without other consideration than love and affection, executed a deed of the premises in question October 25, 1892, to the plaintiff, their daughter, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stevens v. RoseMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Griffin v. HoveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Engel v. LadewigMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Duncombe v. FeltMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Heliker v. HelikerMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Willard v. First Church of Christ, ScientistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Ogle v. BarkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Simpson v. Kistler Investment Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Krug v. ReissigWyoming Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Saunders v. SaundersIllinois Supreme Court · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API