Duncombe v. Felt
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Yan Buren. (Buck, J.) Bill to restrain the cutting and removal of timber and the commission of waste. Defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The bill was filed in this cause for an injunction to restrain the defendant from cutting and removing any of the timber or trees standing or growing upon the premises described in the bill, and from committing or permitting any waste of said premises.
The bill alleges that complainant is the owner in fee *333of the premises, containing about 160 acres, subject to a life-estate in the defendant; that the complainant derived his title through a sheriff’s deed, upon an execution sale to satisfy a judgment against. Seth H. Felt; that said Seth H. Felt derived his title through a deed made and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stevens v. RoseMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Kane v. VanderburghNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
3Cited by6 opinions
- Poole v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Derham v. HoveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Heliker v. HelikerMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Schuman v. SchumanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Anstays v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.