Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Berry

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1880PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to St. Joseph. Trover. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This was an action of trover, brought against defendants below, who are plaintiffs in error, for the conversion of a gas machine and various auxiliary articles contained on a lot and in a house owned and occupied by defendant Parmelia Morrison, wife of defendant Bobert H. Morrison. The alleged conversion consisted in a refusal to deliver back to the plaintiffs below those articles which had been furnished by them to Bobert H. Morrison under a sale, which they claimed to have rescinded for fraud. The facts on which recovery was allowed below were substantially these:

In the spring of 1877…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Emery v. LordMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Willard v. MagoonMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Newcomb v. AndrewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fechheimer v. PeirceMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Governale v. City of OwossoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Stevens v. RoseMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Michigan Mutual Life Insurance v. CronkMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Holmes v. BronsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API