Gillis v. QRX Pharma Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge:
In this putative class action under the federal securities laws, lead plaintiffs Marsha Gillis, Carl Bayney, and Daniel Rehmsmeyer (collectively, “plaintiffs”) claim that the Australian pharmaceutical company QRx Pharma Ltd. (“QRX” or the “Company”) and its former CEO John Ho-laday made false and misleading statements about MoxDuo IR (“MoxDuo”), QRX’s leading drug candidate, while it was under review by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”).
Plaintiffs bring this lawsuit on behalf of all persons who purchased QRX American Depository…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Yorkville Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Nguyen v. New Link Genetics Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- In re Neurotrope, Inc. Sec. Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Altimeo Asset Management v. Qihoo 360 Technology Co. Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Boston Retirement System v. Alexion Pharmaceuticals IncDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.