Legal Opinion
Wien Air Alaska v. Bubbel
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided August 22, 1986No. S-854, S-878PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
FACTS
This is the second time that this contractual dispute has been before the court. The first case, Bubbel v. Wien Air Alaska, Inc., 682 P.2d 374 (Alaska 1984) (hereinafter cited as Bubbel I), arose because of a strike by pilots at Wien Air Alaska (Wien Air). The pilots were demanding that Wien Air use three pilots, instead of two, to operate its Boeing 737 jets. During the strike, Wien Air hired replacement pilots with promises that they would become permanent pilots. The strike ended after a Presidential Emergency Board 1 recommended that Wien use two pilots, but…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Miller v. SearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Day v. a & G Construction Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Alaska Northern Development, Inc. v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Chizmar v. MacKieAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Lee Houston & Associates, Ltd. v. RacineAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- ARCO Alaska, Inc. v. AkersAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Walt v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Reeves v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.