Legal Opinion

Reeves v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 2002No. S-9168, S-9267PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

John Reeves developed an idea to build a visitor center at a turnout overlooking the Trans-Alaska Pipeline near Fairbanks. He described his idea to Alyeska's Fairbanks manager, Keith Burke, in return for Burke's promise not to use the idea without allowing Reeves to participate in its implementation. Yet Alyeska subsequently ceased dealing with Reeves and proceeded to build the visitor center on its own. Reeves sued Alyeska, and a jury awarded him damages under various alternative contract and tort theories. The questions presented here center on the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Air Technology Corp. v. General Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  2. Buoy v. ERA Helicopters, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Reeves v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. City of Kenai v. BurnettAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Exxon Corp. v. AlveyAlaska Supreme Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. 2002 Lawrence R. Buchalter Alaska Trust v. Philadelphia Financial Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. Ranes & Shine, LLC v. MacDonald Miller Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Alaska Electrical Pension Fund v. Bank of America Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  4. Cameron v. CHANG-CRAFTAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Domke v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API