Legal Opinion

People v. Heddens

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 2, 1936No. Crim. No. 2816PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

Defendant W. G. Brown and his codeiendant, Harley Heddens, were convicted by a jury of the offense designated by section 274 of the Penal Code. Defendant W. G. Brown appeals, contending that the facts alleged in the indictment do not constitute a public offense. The indictment is in the words of the statute, substantially conforming to the requirements of the law, and is therefore súfficient.

The criticism of the instruction complained of in the appeal is without merit.

The failure of the court to give any instructions on the subject of accomplices, or the testimony of accomplices, is also…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. ScofieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. People v. BillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. People v. PeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. People v. WagnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. BuffumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. People v. Di GiacomoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. People v. DobkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. People v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API