Legal Opinion

People v. Buffum

California Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1953No. Crim. 5293PublishedCited by 162 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Roy L. BufEum, a physician and surgeon, and Reginald L. Rankin were indicted for and convicted of violating section 182 of the Penal Code1 in that they conspired to use certain means to induce miscarriages contrary to section 274.2 Defendants appeal from the judgments and from an order denying their motions for a new trial.

Pour women who were pregnant went separately to the office of BufEum in Long Beach to solicit his aid in inducing miscarriages. One of the women was accompanied by her mother. BufEum refused to perform the abortions but took the telephone numbers of three of the women and…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. United States v. RabinowichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by162 opinions

  1. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. George Lee Mims, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. United States v. Roy MandujanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. People v. GallardoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API