Legal Opinion

People v. Bill

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 13, 1934No. Crim. No. 1380PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendant was convicted of having possession of cocaine contrary to the provisions of the California Statutes of 1929 (Stats. 1929, p. 380; 2 Deering’s Gen. Laws of 1931, p. 3007), regulating the sale or possession of habit-forming narcotics.

On appeal it is asserted there is a fatal variance between the allegations of the information which charge him with the possession of “a preparation of cocaine” and the proof that the substance which was found in his hotel room consisted of clear cocaine rather than a preparation thereof; that the evidence fails to show the defendant was possessed of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. People v. ScofieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Ex Parte HornefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. People v. KinsleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. People v. Le BaronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. People v. MowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. People v. BrighamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. People v. JaurequiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API