Legal Opinion

People v. Di Giacomo

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 13, 1961No. Crim. 1572PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

The defendant, who is the appellant herein, was charged with, tried by a jury for, and convicted of the offense of perjury, i.e., a violation of section 118 of the Penal Code, moved for a new trial, which was denied; was placed on probation; and appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial and from the judgment of conviction, i.e., the order granting probation.

The determinative issues presented by this appeal concern the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment of conviction under the rule prescribing the quantity and quality of evidence required in perjury cases; and…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. People v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. BrophyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. People v. FolletteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Rolland v. PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. People v. ChadwickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re ImblerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. People v. HagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. RosotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Castro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API