Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Wagner

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1924No. Crim. No. 711PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The defendants, Wagner, Brooks, and Russell, were indicted by the grand jury of Sacramento County for the crime -of criminal syndicalism. The defendants, Vargo and Hewitt, were likewise charged with the same offense. The indictment against the first named defendants was presented and filed in the superior court of said county on the second day of March, 1923, and the indictment against Vargo and Hewitt .presented and filed in the same court on the tenth day of August, 1923. The same attorneys represented all the defendants under both indictments. By stipulation between said attorneys and the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. People v. LloydIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  3. People v. SteelikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. People v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. McClennegenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State v. PattersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State v. DowellIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  4. United States v. SchneidermanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
  5. People v. HeddensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API