People v. Ramirez
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment.
The sole contention on appeal is that, “The defendant’s rights were substantially prejudiced by the comments of the trial judge in the presence of the jury.”
Defendant was adjudged guilty by a jury of selling a preparation of heroin in violation of section 11500 of the Health and Safety Code.
The facts and trial errors, as they appear in the reporter’s transcript, are as follows: A state narcotic enforcement officer, Mr. O’Connor, and an investigator from the district attorney’s office were checking an area known as TTip.ks Camp in El Monte. Both officers…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. TapiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Sharp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
- People v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. WeissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- People v. BowmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. FreytasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.