Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Lincoln General Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided May 16, 2011No. 09SC527PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez
I. Introduction
In this insurance coverage dispute, we review the court of appeals' decision in Lincoln General Insurance Co. v. Bailey, 224 P.3d 836 (Colo.App.2009), which upheld enforcement of a criminal-acts exclusion in an excess-insurance policy that absolved the insurer, Lincoln General Insurance Company ("Lineoln General"), from coverage for damages resulting from eriminal acts committed by Raymond Juhl (the "insured"), Lincoln General's insured.
The insured, driving a rental car under the influence of methamphetamines, led police on a high-speed car chase that ended when, speeding on…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Chacon v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Goodson v. American Standard Insurance Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Public Service Mutual Insurance v. GoldfarbNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Sparks v. St. Paul InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Cyprus Amax Minerals Co. v. Lexington Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Vernon v. Qwest Communications International, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2012
- Fisher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. HansenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- Pinnacol Assurance v. HoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- Green Earth Wellness Center, LLC v. Atain Specialty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2016
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.