Legal Opinion
Larx Co. Inc. v. Nicol
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 11, 1946No. 34,235PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 28 N.W.2d 705. Action for a declaratory judgment to have a certain written contract dated December 10, 1935, between Clinton C. Nicol and Barnes-Noble Company, Inc., a corporation, together with written assignments of a certain trademark and copyright pledged as security for said contract, adjudged invalid and unenforceable.
Plaintiff is the assignee of all the right, title, and interest of the Barnes-Noble Company in and to said contract, trademark, and copyright and holds the same subject to Barnes-Noble Company's obligations therein.
On June 21, 1945, the trial court made…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- AO Smith Corporation v. Petroleum Iron Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Clark Paper & Manufacturing Co. v. StenacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Linn v. SigsbeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Dynamic Air, Inc. v. BlochCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Julius Hyman & Co. v. Velsicol Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Combined Insurance Co. of America v. BodeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Schmidt v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.