Riddle v. Dyche
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Suthebland
The appellant was convicted in the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Alabama of a felony and sentenced to imprisonment. The record of the District Court recites that “ a jury of good and lawful men ” was duly empaneled, sworn and charged. After sentence appellant moved to amend the record entry to show that only eleven men sat as jurors in the case and offered testimony in support of the motion. The court rejected the proof on the ground that oral testimony was not admissible to modify or amend the record and, first reciting that after hearing the evidence and arguments and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Ex Parte Tobias WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Grignon's Lessee v. ASTORSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- In Re CoySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- In Re LennonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Bowen v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- State ex rel. Newsom v. HendersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.