Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Newsom v. Henderson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1968PublishedCited by 361 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Cheep Justice Burnett

delivered the opinion of the Court..This habeas corpus petition was dismissed below by the trial judge after an evidentiary hearing. There was no bill of exceptions preserved of this evidentiary hearing because the Public Defender, who represented New-som in this hearing, concluded that there, was absolutely nothing in the record which would be beneficial one way or the other to the plaintiff in error and preserving the record would be entirely frivolous. The Public Defender appeared before this Court and made such an announcement.' As a' result of which we ordered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Tom TongSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Riddle v. DycheSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. James Milton Waddy and James Barrow Ransom v. Henry Heer, Warden, Tennessee State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  4. State ex rel. Underwood v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Wilson Wooten v. Lynn Bomar, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by361 opinions

  1. Archer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Burford v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. RitchieTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Potts v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Faulkner v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2007

356 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API