Legal Opinion

In Re Coy

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 14, 1888No. 1395PublishedCited by 201 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. Tuts was a petition for a writ-of habeas corpus. The District Attorney of the United States for the District of Indiana demurred to the petition, and the demurrer was sustained and the writ refused. The petitioners appealed. The ease is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller

This is an appeal .from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Indiana.

The case in that court arose upon an application for a writ of habeas corpus made on behalf of Simeon Coy and William F. A. Bernhamer, whose petition alleged that they were restrained of their liberty and detained in the custody of Edward Hawkins, the marshal of the United States for the District of Indiana, and Isaac King, sheriff of Marion County in that State, who claimed to hold the prisoners under the authority of a judgment of the United States District Court. The petition sets forth the nature of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  3. Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Ex Parte YarbroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Ex Parte Tobias WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by201 opinions

  1. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. NielsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Bowen v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

196 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API