Legal Opinion

In Re Lennon

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 19, 1897No. 254PublishedCited by 198 opinions

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. • This was a petition for a writ of habeas corpus originally filed in the Circuit Court for the Northern District of Ohio. ' The petitioner alleged that he was a citizen of the State of Ohio, and was unlawfully restrained of his liberty by the marshal, under an order of the Circuit Court of the United States, made in a case pending in that court, wherein the Toledo, Ann Arbor and North Michigan Kail way…

Read the full summary

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. • This was a petition for a writ of habeas corpus originally filed in the Circuit Court for the Northern District of Ohio. ' The petitioner alleged that he was a citizen of the State of Ohio, and was unlawfully restrained of his liberty by the marshal, under an order of the Circuit Court of the United States, made in a case pending in that court, wherein the Toledo, Ann Arbor and North Michigan Kail way Company, a corporation of the State of Michigan, was complainant, and several railway companies, citizens of Ohio, as well as…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown

The only question which can properly be raised upon this writ is whether the Circuit Court exceeded its jurisdiction in holding the petitioner for a contempt and in imposing upon him a fine therefor. ¥e are not at liberty to consider the testimony, or to inquire whether the facts, as they appeared upon the hearing, justified the action of the Circuit Court. It is only upon the theory that the proceedings and judgment of the court were nullities that we are authorized to reverse its action. It has been too frequently decided, to be now open to question, that a writ of habeas corpus cannot be…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. NielsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Ex Parte Tobias WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  3. Tennessee v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. In Re TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. US v. Don Fernando De La Maza Arredondo & OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1832

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by198 opinions

  1. Regal Knitwear Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. People Ex Rel. Gallo v. AcunaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Alemite Mfg. Corporation v. StaffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  4. Knewel v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Toledo, Peoria & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

193 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API