Legal Opinion

Brock v. Town of Mount Pleasant

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 13, 2016No. Appellate Case 2015-000406; 27621PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice, KITTREDGE.

We issued a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals’ decision in Brock v. Town of Mount Pleasant, 411 S.C. 106, 767 S.E.2d 203 (Ct.App.2014), that the Town of Mount Pleasant (the Town) did not violate the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 1 by taking unnoticed action following executive ses sions at special meetings. Having carefully reviewed the record and law, we agree with Petitioner Stephen George Brock that the Town technically violated FOIA and that the court of appeals erred in relying on the discussion of regular meetings in Lambries v. Saluda County…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Elam v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Felts v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. CFRE, LLC v. Greenville County AssessorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. City of Rock Hill v. HarrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  5. Sparks v. Palmetto Hardwood, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. DomainsNewMedia.com, LLC v. Hilton Head Island-Bluffton Chamber CommerceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  2. Atkins v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
  3. Callawasie v. Gregory MartinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2022
  4. Callawasie v. Gregory MartinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2022
  5. Carla Denise Garrison v. Target CorporationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API