Legal Opinion
In Re Meisler
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 19, 2001No. 98-BG-1758PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
On September 14, 2000, the Supreme Court of Florida permanently disbarred respondent from the practice of law in that state. In doing so, it accepted an uncontested report by the hearing referee. The report noted that respondent had been permitted to resign from the Florida bar, with the right to reapply within three years, by order of April 23, 1998, but had nonetheless continued to practice law. In addition, the report noted respondent’s extensive previous disciplinary history, his plea to a felony, and his “total lack of remorse” for his various acts of misconduct. Before us is a report…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re McBrideDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Matter of VelasquezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In re SaloDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- In re ChagantiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- In Re ReisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re WeekesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re GruberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.