Legal Opinion
In re Chaganti
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 4, 2016No. 15-BG-564PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
On October 28, 2014, the Supreme Court of Missouri determined that Respondent Naren Chaganti violated Missouri’s Rules of Professional Conduct by improperly communicating with a represented party. The court suspended him indefinitely from the practice of law, adding that it would not entertain a petition for reinstatement for one year.
The' District of Columbia Office of Disciplinary Counsel now recommends that we impose reciprocal discipline and suspend Mr. Chaganti for one year, with reinstatement conditioned upon proof of fitness to practice law.1 Mr. Chaganti concedes that D.C. Bar R. XI §…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re SibleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re ZdravkovichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Henderson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re BenjaminDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re MeislerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re KatzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- IN RE GERALD I. KATZDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- IN RE MENACHEM E. LIFSHITZDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- IN RE SEAN P. MCMULLENDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- In re Claude D. ConvisserDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.