Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District

California Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1931No. Docket Nos. Sac. 4513, 4514PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

These two actions, which have been consolidated on appeal, were instituted under the provisions of sections 1060 to 1062a of the Code of Civil Procedure by the plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and other land owners and water users situated outside of the exterior boundaries of the defendant, the Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District, for a determination of their rights and duties and those of the said irrigation districts in the service of water to them by said district and the rates to be charged therefor. These actions have been before this court on a prior appeal wherein this court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Pasadena v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Levin v. SaroffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Henderson v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Hanlon v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Byington v. Sacramento Valley West Side Canal Co.California Supreme Court · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. PG&E Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Mercedes Bus Line, Inc. v. RojasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1949
  3. Wilde v. City of DunsmuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Wyandotte Orchards, Inc. v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Rutherford v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API