Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District

California Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1929No. Docket No. Sac. 4281PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

The judgment denying declaratory relief under section 1060 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for lack of jurisdiction, is reversed with directions to the court below to overrule the demurrer.

Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and some eighty-one other land owners, sues to have his water rights in certain real property declared under a deed, contract and order of the Railroad Commission of the state of California, which instruments affect his title and right of possession to said property. Defendant demurred generally and specially to the jurisdiction of the court over such subject matter. The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Gilmer v. ThrockmortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  3. City of Pasadena v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Pocantico Water Works Co. v. BirdNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Hildreth v. Montecito Creek Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1903

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Hoyt v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Kessloff v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API