Rutherford v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
Petitioner instituted this mandamus proceeding on behalf of himself and others to compel respondent district to issue to petitioner a receipt in full for water delivered to his lands upon the payment theretofore of $6 per acre-foot. The controversy between respondent and the group represented by petitioner is of long standing. Various phases of this controversy have been before this court on four different occasions in recent years. (Henderson v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irr. Dist., 207 Cal. 215 [277 Pac. 487]; Dankert v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irr. Dist., 211 Cal. 87 [293 Pac. 785]; Henderson v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Henderson v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Southland Life Ins. Co. v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- S. E. Hendricks Co. v. Thomas Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Henderson v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- National Sewing-Mach. Co. v. Willcox & Gibbs Sewing-Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United Guaranty Residential Insurance Co. v. DimmickColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Carey v. Retirement BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Wyandotte Orchards, Inc. v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Wyandotte Orchards, Inc. v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975