Legal Opinion

Williams & Fickett v. Cnty. of Fresno

California Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2017No. S224476PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCantil-Sakauye, C.J.

*1264 As a general rule, a party must exhaust available administrative remedies as a prerequisite to seeking relief in the courts. "In the property tax context, application of the exhaustion principle means that a taxpayer ordinarily may not file or pursue a court action for a tax refund without first applying to the local board of equalization for assessment reduction under [Revenue and Taxation Code] section 1603 and filing an administrative tax refund claim under section 5097." 1 ( Steinhart v. County of Los Angeles (2010) 47 Cal.4th 1298 , 1308, 104 Cal.Rptr.3d 195 , 223 P.3d 57 , italics…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Newman v. Emerson Radio Corp.California Supreme Court · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Alvarado v. Dart Container Corp. of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Gerardo Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising Int'l Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. In re La Paloma Generating Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2018
  4. People v. Tidwell CA6California Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Collins v. WolfDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API