Legal Opinion

Alvarado v. Dart Container Corp. of California

California Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 2018No. S232607PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChin, J.

*350 *549 In this case, we decide how an employee's overtime pay rate should be calculated when the employee has earned a flat sum bonus during a single pay period. Specifically, we consider whether the divisor for purposes of calculating the per-hour value of the bonus should be (1) the number of hours the employee actually worked during the pay period, including overtime hours ; (2) the number of nonovertime hours the employee worked during the pay period; or (3) the number of nonovertime hours that exist in the pay period, regardless of the number of hours the employee actually worked. We conclude…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Morillion v. Royal Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Dynamex Operations W., Inc. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Aaron Senne v. Kansas City Royals BaseballCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. Roderick Magadia v. Wal-Mart AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  4. ZB, N.A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Cindy Castillo v. Bank of America, NaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API