Dr. David D. Stark v. Advanced Magnetics, Inc., and Jerome Goldstein, Ernest v. Groman and Lee Josephson
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Dr. David D. Stark appeals the summary judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1 denying his request for correction of inventorship of six United States patents assigned to Advanced Magnetics, Inc. (AMI) and dismissing the accompanying state law counts. We vacate the grant of summary judgment as based on an incorrect legal theory, and remand for determination of the merits of his claims.
Background
Dr. Stark, a physician specializing in radiology, collaborated with AMI in certain experimental studies that he states relate to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Members of the New York State Crime Victims BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Burke, Inc. v. Bruno Independent Living Aids, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Young Dental Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Q3 Special Products, Inc., and David G. KraenzleCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- St. John's University, New York v. BoltonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Calvetti v. AntcliffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.