Legal Opinion

Rochester-Hall Drug Co. v. Bowden

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 4, 1928No. 6 Div. 183PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals, sought to be reviewed, contains a statement of facts which such court ascertained to exist from the record, and applies to those facts certain principles of law, resulting, in a holding that, from them, appellant was entitled to the general charge. The principles of law asserted by the court are correctly stated.

While the rule has frequently been referred to by this court that,\upon certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review its rulings, it will not review the facts “for the purpose of revising the application of same to the law by said Court of Appeals”…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. MinderhoutSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. SelfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Robinson & Co. v. GreeneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  4. Ex parte SteversonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. Lancaster v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Solmica of the Gulf Coast, Inc. v. BraggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  2. Craft v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Mobile Pure Milk Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Mobile O. R. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Stallings v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API