Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Thaggard

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 21, 1963No. 3 Div. 82PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

This is a petition for certiorari seeking review of a decision of the Court of Appeals.

The petition recites in pertinent part as follows:

“Your petitioner further shows unto this Honorable Court that the Court of Appeals erred in said cause in holding that there was insufficient legal evidence to support the charge of false pretense as set out in the affidavit supporting the warrant of arrest, and in discharging the petitioner below from custody on the ground of no probable cause for believing that the offense of false pretense had been committed.
“It is respectfully submitted…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ex parte Louisville & Nashville R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. WomackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Ex Parte PesnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  4. Southeastern Const. Co. v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  5. Pigford v. BillingsleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. City of Dothan v. HollowaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Ex Parte BlandSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Flannagin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  4. Humphrey v. BoschungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  5. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API