Legal Opinion

Bryan v. Banks

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1929No. Docket No. 6738PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.

This is an action on a promissory note of defendants Carrere and Hawley in the sum of $14,400, payable in installments, with attorneys’ fees in case of suit, payment thereof being assumed by appellant Carrere & Hawley, Inc., a corporation, and payment of one-half thereof being assumed by appellant Banks; the stock of Carrere & Hawley, Inc., with the exception of one share, issued for the purpose of incorporating, was owned wholly by Carrere and Hawley. On this note $2,400 had been paid, leaving $12,000 unpaid, but only $4,800 thereof was due at the time of the filing of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Erkenbrecher v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Anoka Lumber Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Chung Kee v. DavidsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. De La Beckwith v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. McNeese v. McNeeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Black v. Solano Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Douillard v. WooddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Lowman v. StaffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Williams v. KinseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Garratt v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API