Legal Opinion
Garratt v. Baker
California Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1936No. S. F. 15450PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendants after a demurrer to her complaint was sustained without leave to amend.
The allegations of the complaint are simple. Three persons, decedent Edward G. Garratt, defendant A. H. Baker and defendant John Callahan, all married men, were engaged in business as partners. They entered into an agreement by the terms of which each agreed that in the event of the death of any one of them, the two survivors would pay to the widow of the deceased partner the sum of $500 per month as long as they and she should live. Edward C. Garratt…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Woodhead Lumber Co. v. E. G. Niemann Investments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Bryan v. BanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Warfield v. BassoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Stanton v. Santa Ana Sugar Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Papadakos v. SoaresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by27 opinions
- Northstar Financial Advisors Inc. v. Schwab InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Shell v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Johnson v. Holmes Tuttle Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- Neverkovec v. FredericksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.