Legal Opinion

Williams v. Kinsey

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 1946No. Civ. 14986PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Defendant appeals from an adverse judgment.

It appears from the record that during the year 1941 plaintiff was a licensed real estate broker actively engaged in such business in the city of Los Angeles. Defendant, though not a licensed real estate broker, was an operator in real estate on a more or less large scale. He published and circulated among some 800 real estate brokers, including plaintiff, brochures in which he set forth his holdings on which he was open to proposals. Through these brochures defendant advertised that he dealt through brokers only and would pay a real estate…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Decou v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Eggert v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Firpo v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Rickards v. NoonanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Gantner v. GantnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Batson v. StrehlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Oldis v. La Societe Francaise De Bienfaisance MutuelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Marks v. Walter G. McCarty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Stone v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API