Chung Kee v. Davidson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Calaveras County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
The defendants W. Cook and A. Cook executed a deed which, upon its face, purported to be an absolute conveyance of certain property therein described, consisting in part of some mines, which deed was in fact a mortgage to secure certain indebtedness *523from the Cooks to the defendants L. Davidson and S. C„ Peek. Afterwards, the latter persons executed and delivered to the former an agreement, in writing, which stipulated that if, by a certain time, the indebtedness secured by the mortgage deed should be paid, L. Davidson and S. C. Peek would reconvey the property set out therein to the…
2Cited by34 opinions
- Parker v. JefferyOregon Supreme Court · 1894
- Lisenby v. NewtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Montgomery v. RiefUtah Supreme Court · 1897
- Reed v. Adams Steel & Wire WorksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Bacon v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.