Siekierda v. Com., Dept. of Transp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice CASTILLE.
This Court granted review to determine whether a Pennsylvania-licensed driver who has been convicted of driving while intoxicated in Indiana, a sister state which, like Pennsylvania, is a signatory of the Drivers License Compact of 1961 (the “Compact”)1, can avoid the one-year suspension of his Pennsylvania driving privileges otherwise required under the Compact because it was not clear that the Indiana proof of the conviction, which consisted of a court abstract, was forwarded by the Indiana driver’s licensing authority. The lower courts dismissed the administrative…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TilghmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Com., Dept. of Transp. v. McCaffertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Sullivan v. COM. DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Harrington v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Albert v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Koken v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing v. WeaverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Nardone v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Barren v. CommonwealthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Connor v. Archdiocese of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.