Legal Opinion

Koken v. Reliance Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 2006No. 4 MAP 2004PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice CASTILLE.

This is a direct appeal from a single-judge Commonwealth Court order that denied the petition of appellant Mawson & Mawson, Inc. (“Mawson”) to enforce a third party proof of claim (“POC”) and its attendant release, and allowed third party claimant Richard Ruhl to withdraw the POC. The question before this Court is whether and when such a third party POC, filed in response to an insurance company’s liquidation, may be withdrawn. For the following reasons, we find that the Commonwealth Court erred, and accordingly, we reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ShifflerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Zane v. Friends HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Com., Dept. of Transp. v. McCaffertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Oberneder v. Link Computer Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. FithianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Chanceford Aviation Properties, L.L.P. v. Chanceford Township Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Ario v. Ingram Micro, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API