Legal Opinion

Nardone v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 2015PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice STEVENS.

This appeal implicates divergent deci-sional overlays to the statutory scheme governing chemical testing of persons suspected of DUI and related traffic offenses. Pronouncements of the Commonwealth Court have consistently construed the “Implied Consent Law” at 75 Pa.C.S. § 1547 to require a motorist to assent unequivocally to an official request to take whichever statutorily-prescribed chemical test police select on pain of automatic license suspension, whereas Superior Court construction has discerned a motorist’s compliance with the law if he responds to the official…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Hannaberry HVAC v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Trizechahn Gateway LLC v. TitusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Oliver v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Myers, D.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Trust Agrmt. of E. Taylor Appeal of: Wells FargoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. A. Factor v. Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Commonwealth v. MoserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API