Legal Opinion
Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. E. Machlett & Son
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 29, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INCH, District Judge.
Objections to interrogatories in a patent suit. Plaintiff possesses a patent for a method for separating neon from gases with which it is mixed. It is a process patent relating “to a process for purifying the neon from the gases with which it is mixed.” Claude patent, No. 1,191,495.
The suit is at issue. Plaintiff submits 51 interrogatories. Defendant has no objection to answering all these interrogatories except 3, 5,14, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 41, and 44a.
The process seems to be purely a chemical one.
The controversy, on this motion, appears to be whether or not,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commercial Union of America, Inc. v. Anglo-South American Bank, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. A. Klipstein & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
- John D. Park & Sons Co. v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
- A. B. Dick Co. v. Underwood Typewriter Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1916
- Grasselli Chemical Co. v. National Aniline & Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hirshhorn v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Lever Bros. Co. v. Proctor & Gamble Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1941
- Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. Rainbow Light, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1927
- Remington Rand, Inc. v. Control Instrument Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1947
- Steinfur Patents Corp. v. Moos Fur Dyeing Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1931