Legal Opinion
Steinfur Patents Corp. v. Moos Fur Dyeing Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 23, 1931No. 5504PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INCH, District Judge.
The plaintiff’s patents, here involved, have been duly adjudicated to be valid in prior suits against other parties. Plaintiff, at the time of filing its complaint in this suit, filed certain interrogatories.
There has been considerable delay in obtaining answers to these interrogatories. Whether this was due to plaintiff or defend.ant or both is now immaterial. Suffice it to say that during all this time defendants have never filed objections to these interrogatories.
On the contrary, it appears from the record of the court that on August 26, 1931, an order was granted on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- A. B. Dick Co. v. Underwood Typewriter Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1916
- Grasselli Chemical Co. v. National Aniline & Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1920
- Philadelphia Rubber Works Co. v. United States Rubber Reclaiming WorksDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1915
- Philadelphia Rubber Works Co. v. United States Rubber Reclaiming WorksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- John Wood Mfg. Co. v. Keiner-Williams Stamping Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lever Bros. Co. v. Proctor & Gamble Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1941
- Catalin Corp. of America v. SlosseDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1939