Legal Opinion

Recovery House VI v. City of Eugene

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 8, 1997No. LUBA 97-021; CA A98493PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Petitioner Recovery House VI appealed to LUBA from the City of Eugene’s issuance of a conditional use permit for which petitioner had applied. LUBA held that it lacked “jurisdiction” to consider petitioner’s argument that petitioner was not required to obtain a conditional use permit in order to conduct the use in question. Petitioner seeks review, and we reverse and remand.

Petitioner applied for the permit in connection with a “recovery house” that it operates in a residential zone, housing 16 unrelated men who are recovering from alcohol or drug dependency. Petitioner had operated the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gage v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Clark v. ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Columbia Steel Castings Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Reusser v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Medford Assembly of God v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Grabhorn v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Root v. Klamath CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Hillyer's Mid-City Ford, Inc. v. City of WoodburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Recovery House VI v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Carlsen v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API