Recovery House VI v. City of Eugene
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.
Petitioner Recovery House VI appealed to LUBA from the City of Eugene’s issuance of a conditional use permit for which petitioner had applied. LUBA held that it lacked “jurisdiction” to consider petitioner’s argument that petitioner was not required to obtain a conditional use permit in order to conduct the use in question. Petitioner seeks review, and we reverse and remand.
Petitioner applied for the permit in connection with a “recovery house” that it operates in a residential zone, housing 16 unrelated men who are recovering from alcohol or drug dependency. Petitioner had operated the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gage v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Clark v. ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1964
- Columbia Steel Castings Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Reusser v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Medford Assembly of God v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Grabhorn v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Root v. Klamath CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Hillyer's Mid-City Ford, Inc. v. City of WoodburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Recovery House VI v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Carlsen v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.