Legal Opinion

Hillyer's Mid-City Ford, Inc. v. City of Woodburn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 7, 1998No. LUBA 97-220; CA A102597PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Petitioners are three separate entities that are engaged in automotive and related businesses. Each petitioner sought to install an on-premises commercial sign, of a size and configuration that the City of Woodburn’s sign ordinance allows only for “integrated business centers.” As required by the ordinance, petitioners filed sign permit applications with the city to authorize the signs. Insofar as the record, the parties’ arguments, or LUBA’s opinion shows, neither the city council nor any inferior city official or body made a final decision to grant or deny the applications. Instead, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Doughton v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Medford Assembly of God v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Recovery House VI v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Owen Development Group, Inc. v. City of GearhartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Weeks v. City of TillamookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Just v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Leupold & Stevens, Inc. v. City of BeavertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Cogan v. City of BeavertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API