Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Root v. Klamath County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 23, 2014No. 2013008; A155037PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.

Petitioners seek judicial review of a final order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) affirming an amendment by Klamath County to its comprehensive plan and zoning maps. The amendment added approximately 68,302 acres owned by intervenor-respondent JWTR, LLC to the county’s Destination Resort Overlay (DRO) map of eligible lands. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

I. BACKGROUND

The facts pertinent to our review are not disputed. JWTR owns land in Klamath County for which it seeks approval for the siting of a destination resort under ORS 197.435 to 197.467. To that end, JWTR…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Younger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Gunderson, LLC v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Citizens for Responsibility v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. Tigard Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Recovery House VI v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Columbia Riverkeeper v. Columbia Cnty.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. Gould v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. Nicita v. City of Oregon CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. Royal Blue Organics v. City of SpringfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API